America's Right-Wing Populism Is on Its Deathbed
In both domestic and foreign policy, Donald Trump increasingly resembles George W. Bush.
Donald Trump’s unlikely rise to the presidency in 2016 marked one of the most spectacular political upsets in American history. The Democrats were so confident in their victory that they didn’t even bother to field a competitive field in their primary, it fell to Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders to throw his hat in the ring in the name of democracy and open debate in the Democratic Party.
With that annoyance out of the way, Hillary Clinton plowed through the general election in confidence. Pretty much every political observer thought that she had it in the bag (including me). But then Trump proved us all wrong. He did so by waging one of the most clever political campaigns in American history. Unlike many other Republicans whose political toolkit consisted of accusing the Democrats of being Big Government socialists who want to destroy America, Trump went after his opponents, Democrats and Republicans alike, with a mix of left-wing and right-wing attacks.
Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton were warmongers, in Trump’s telling; the former game show host also railed against Wall Street, the regime of globalization, and America’s porous borders. It ended up being a winning combination for him not once but twice. At the end of the campaign in 2024 you had to admit: Trump is actually pretty good at politics.
But in neither the first term nor the second have the populist politics that Trump promised actually fully emerged. In both foreign and domestic spheres, Trump’s administration increasingly resembles what you might imagine a third term of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney’s presidency would look like.
Abroad, Trump has essentially outsourced American foreign policy to the relatively minor state of Israel, which has not-so-minor political influence in the Republican Party via Christian Zionist and Likud-aligned megadonors. Trump sat by and watched Israel kill one of the very men he was negotiating with over Iran’s civilian nuclear program; the best U.S. intelligence estimate is that Iran hasn’t made the decision to pursue nuclear weapons over the past 20 years and if they did choose to make that decision, it would be months or even years until they reached that threshold.
The consequence of Trump pulling out of the Iran deal negotiated by President Barack Obama, then, appears to be the war we are all watching on our social media feeds and television screens. Thousands of people will be maimed and killed, mostly Iranian but also Israeli.
And if Trump chooses to involve America directly in the war — rather than simply providing military defense to Israel, which is essentially encouraging it to launch this unprovoked and unnecessary war by shielding it from most of the consequences — we will see Americans hurt and killed, too.
None of this seems out of place with how, say, Dick Cheney would be running American foreign policy. The right-wing populist Donald Trump, who would engaged in steel-eyed negotiations even with long-time adversaries in the pursuit of ending endless wars, has been replaced by the easily manipulated Donald Trump who now trusts a wanted war criminal named Benjamin Netanyahu over his own Director of National Intelligence, who assured Congress that America has no evidence that Iran is even working towards a nuclear weapon.
We have no idea how much blood will be shed before this frankly stupid war is over, but what MAGA can look forward to on the other side is…a tax bill that could’ve easily been written by former Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan.
The bill includes only modest increases in benefits for the GOP’s increasingly working class base while extending deficit-busting tax rates for large firms and Big Business.
It’s those very same businesses that Trump seems reticent to confront when it comes to his marquee issue: immigration. In recent weeks, Trump’s Department of Homeland Security through its ICE agency has been engaged in high-profile immigration raids in blue cities. But the administration’s deportation record actually lags behind other American presidents, and much of what Trump is doing on this front is simply theater.
The reason so many unauthorized immigrants are working all over the economy is that, well, the economy demands them. That’s why Trump recently recently called off raids on certain sectors of the economy — those titans of industry paid him a visit and told him that he needed those laborers. (Although of this writing the administration appears to have flipped yet again on that issue, so who knows what the policy will be by time you read this.)
If Trump really wanted to tackle issues like ending America’s endless involvement in overseas wars, our elitist tax and trade policies, and illegal immigration, it would require confronting powerful elites ranging from the Israel lobby to Big Ag to Wall Street. But Trump has a habit of caving when he comes face to face with concentrated power. He has always wanted elite approval and he only lashes out at them when he doesn’t get it. Such a vessel was never going to be a mascot for populism. At best, he may just be George W. Trump.
Sorry Zaid, I have great respect for you and usually I enjoy reading your thought provoking pieces. But I must fully disagree with this article and it was incoherent and hard to follow at times. First you start by talking about how Trump has betrayed his base and right-wing populism. Then all of a sudden, you switch gears and launch into a rant about the Israel-Iran Conflict. What do the two have to do with each other? To be fair, you did try to make an attempt to connect the two but it missed the mark and still didn’t quite work.
I don’t think right-wing populism is going anywhere. The MAGA Movement whatever it’s internal disagreements appears to be going strong while the establishment of the party is running scared and the left is fragmented and fighting amongst itself. The examples you gave respectfully, don’t work. As to taxes, both establishment and populist Republicans are in agreement on tax cuts. On immigration, Trump and Tom Homan are deporting as many people as he can with what limited resources they have. There are twenty million illegal immigrants in this country, they can’t possibly in the blink of an eye deport them all and won’t be able to period.
I’m glad President Trump is talking about possibly softening the deportations. I think the farming and hospitality industries and in turn our economy really need those illegal immigrant workers as due to the low national birth rate, we don’t have the population to make up for that labor shortage. It’s not “windrow dressing” so much as it is President Trump being pragmatic and doing what’s best for the country. We also need to keep in mind that politics is the art of the compromise, you get what you can get while you can get it. Furthermore, all Presidents must grapple with balancing serving their base and serving the American people. Sometimes they have to make tough decisions or compromises that’s what Presidents have to do. It is unrealistic to expect them to accomplish everything you hope they will even in two terms.
Israel is FAR from being a “relatively-minor” state. That comes off as an immature and childish shot at a whole nation of millions of people for no reason other than spite. Israel is a regional power with the best army in the Middle East and nuclear weapons. They are would leaders in science, medicine, technology, water, agriculture, and protecting the environment. They are regional leaders in women’s rights, minority rights, religious freedom, LGBTQ+ rights, and disability inclusion. The accusation we’ve “outsourced our foreign policy” to them is with all due respect, Zaid, ridiculous. Also, while I too am no fan of Benjamin Netanyahu and the current Israeli government, he is no war criminal.
Your comparison of the Trump foreign policy to Bush or Cheney’s is also total nonsense. Bush and Cheney would never have pushed the Western Europeans to pay more into NATO, withdrew U.S. troops from Africa, closed down USAID and the NED, declared us out of the business of regime change, talked about negotiating with Iran, or initiated peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. Nor would they have made peace between India and Pakistan as he did.
I don’t buy that Iran decided not develop a nuclear weapon 20 years ago or that they would need a long time to develop one. I’d have to see that confirmed by multiple sources and extensively verified before I’d believe that. I also don’t see any parallels here with Iraq. You seem to be very angry in writing this article, Zaid which I can well understand. It’s tragic that Iranian civilians have lost their lives in the current skirmishes between Israel and Iran. But keep in mind two things: 1) Israel did not kill them on purpose. 2) Israel and the United States sent out warnings to the people of Iran to evacuate. Also, don’t forget Iran IS purposely targeting Israeli civilians and killing them. I don’t see any mention of that fact in your article. Your accusation of a vast Zionist conspiracy also is total nonsense. At the end of the day, I’m praying for peace between the two countries, that God watch over and protect the peoples of Israel and Iran and that Iran’s nuclear program is dismantled for good.
I, personally, will shed no tears for the demise of the Iranian regime.