Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DrOranj's avatar

"Immigration enforcement based on sanctioning employers who engage in illegal hiring and practices"

I do not understand why the "stealing our jobs" people do not start at the source. "Stealing a job" sounds like a guy taking someone's Wal-Mart vest and saying "this is my job now".

It's hard to say "deport the criminals" when Stephen Miller is one defining what a "criminal" is. These are people who are terminally online and have brought their edgelord stupidity into the real world. The internet is a fine place to visit, but a terrible place to live.

Expand full comment
Matt L.'s avatar
5dEdited

IMO, Trump is in process of creating leverage for an amnesty deal. A deal that gives amnesty to illegal immigrants who have been here X # of years, shown productivity, can speak English, etc. in exchange for a permanent sealing of the border via Congress. A sealing that cannot be easily undone by future Executives without some kind of painful, financial “tariff”.

Only by creating this kind of mass immigration ‘angst’ can political conditions be ripe for this kind of deal.

You create Ying, and then Yang is possible.

If Trump could pull this off (and he’s the only POTUS in my lifetime who I think could), it would seal for him a positive legacy.

As for Gallup polls, not sure how much credibility I lend to those. And I may be speaking for a good portion of MAGA when saying so. My read is that the overwhelming portion of all Americans are approving of deportation of new, unproductive immigrants.

We are $37T in debt now and no longer a dumping ground for the poor. If you think otherwise then you also believe we should just go Imperial and take over the lands they come from, and export our American ‘benefits’ directly.

BTW, there are those in Mexico City that don’t want American tech nomads anymore. Anti-gringo protest occurred this week there:

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1941669054219157573

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts